Euthanasia is a very polemic topic in bioethics and it is still illegal in most of the countries. There are a few types of euthanasia, such as active and passive. The passive euthanasia is the act of letting a terminal patient die in a natural way. It means that the doctor will not interfere by giving the patient any kind drug. The patients request the doctor to stop the treatment that is keeping them alive.
The author of our text book gives us a few arguments in pro to passive euthanasia. First, the individual rights over bodies and lives, it means that all human being have the freedom to do whatever they want with their lives. Individuals have the right to do ...view middle of the document...
The doctors will not put effort to cure people, since the patient was diagnosed with an incurable illness. Passive euthanasia can induce doctors to a mistake when they decide that nothing can be done for the patient.
The second argument is the possibility of researchers finds a cure for the terminal patient’s illness. Health care providers will refute the patient the opportunity get better, since some kind of miracle cure can happen at any moment. What the author means by miracle cure is the possibility of discovery of a new drug or surgical procedure to cure the terminal patient.
Third the author states the impossibility of opting for death, since the medicine stands to life not death. He argues that health care professionals should always opt to save peoples lives and not lose them. Medicine was created to help people, it means save their lives, if the doctors start using this to help people die, medicine will lose its purpose. Thus, doctors should not think twice between life and death.
Finally the interference with God’s plan; Humans have no right over their lives just God can give and take our lives away. It is like we are born with an expiration date, however God is the only one that knows when is the time for us to leave the earth. Suicide as we know is against God’s law, consequently it is a sin.
I’ve been weighed all the arguments presented by the author and I came with the conclusion that I agree with passive euthanasia in that, I believe that humans have the right to die with dignity. Keep treating terminal patients against their will it’s not the solution for their suffering, however putting those out of their misery will be relieve not just for them but also their loved ones. I have a cousin that is doctor in Brazil, once she told me about one of her patients that had pancreas cancer without treatment because of the advanced stage of the tumor. She said that every time she walked into the cancer ward she could hear this patient moaning. The doctors would treat him with morphine, but at some point it was not working anymore. The patient’s family tried to convince the doctors to do the active euthanasia, but it is illegal in Brazil. Thus, after a few weeks he had an agonizing death.
I mentioned the case of the terminal cancer patient, just to defend my opinion about the passive euthanasia. I do not believe that we came to this world to suffer, so why should we force someone to go through a painful inevitable death. I am convinced that not just the doctors but also the family have the obligation to give the patient the chance to choose the best way to deal with death. I understand that is hard to let someone that we love die, but I also believe that keep them alive with not quality of life is selfishness.
I would like to refute a few arguments presented by the author against...