Employee Contractor Case Study

1738 words - 7 pages

Queensland University of technology |
Employee-Contractor Case Study |
By Monil Mehta |
|
Word Count: 1450 |
8/21/2014 |
n8911941

|

1.0 Introduction
The main purpose of this report is to distinguish and provide evidence to the fact that Anne Parish, a former employee at Ace Accident Insurance in Cairns was treated unfair by her former employer. In employment relations all employees should be treated and remunerated fairly, irrespective of them being an independent contractor or an employee (Fair Work Act, 2009).
In this report it shall be determined whether Anne Parish was an ...view middle of the document...

Summary of common law test* |
Factor | Indicative of employment | Indicative of independent contracting |
Do you have control over the way you perform a task? | | Yes |
Do you supply or maintain your tools or equipment? | | Yes |
Do you work standard hours? | | No |
Are you paid according to task completion, rather than receiving wages based on time worked? | | Yes |
Do you incur any loss or receive any profit from the job | | Yes |
Do you accept responsibility for any defective or remedial work that was your doing? | | Yes |
Are you free to work for others at the same time? | No | |
Do you accept that work lasts for the term of each particular task or contract? | No | |
Do you have the right to employ or subcontract any aspect of your work to another person? | No | |
Do you have the right to employ an apprentice or trainee in the execution of contracts? | No | |
Do you understand the arrangement as a contract for services? | | Yes |
Is tax deducted by your hirer from your pay? | | No |
Do you provide your own public liability and sickness and accident Insurance Cover | | Yes |
Do you receive paid holidays or sick leave? | | No |
Do you render tax invoices for payment? | | Yes |
Do you file GST returns? | | Yes |
Source: Australian Business Lawyers & Advisors, 2011
Summing up the common law test Anne has a contract for service, which makes her an independent contractor. Anne Parish had signed a contract for employment with Ace Insurance Company which stated her duties and responsibilities as a contractor. She was paid on a commission basis only on every policy sold. Anne was also insistent of the fact that she won’t go to the office on a daily basis as she was self-employed. She controlled her remuneration and had her own transport. All of these points suggest that Anne had been a contractor to Ace Accident Company.
The multi-factor test is not always accurate and depending from case to case it shall be determined and different indicia should be valued differently upon different situations.
3.0 Argument for Anne Perish Being a Contractor
In Anne Parish’s case taking into consideration all the factors of the employability test it is revealed that she has a contract for service, only for which she is remunerated. Therefore she is considered as an independent contractor. But there are many criteria’s such as tax cut, reporting relationship and liability of sick leave on Anne which indicates her an employee as well.
4.1 Duties Performed and Control
The amount of input put and the reporting relationship between Anne and Ace Accident Company is evident to Anne being performing duties as like the employees of a company. Anne had to provide a report on a daily basis about her productivity and efforts put to sell policies. Although being an independent contractor she had no legal obligations to establish reporting relationship: Zuijs v Wirth Bros Pty Ltd. (1955). She was...

Other assignments on Employee Contractor Case Study

Irac For Rojo And Toland Essay

2000 words - 8 pages only in actions based on section 416 of the Restatement Second of Torts (hiring person liable for contractor's negligence in spite of providing that the contractor take special precautions), but that Privette had no effect on an action such as his, which was brought under section 413 (hiring person who fails to provide for special precautions liable for contractor's negligence).” IRAC for Toland v. Sunland Housing Group Inc. Issue This case

Estrada V. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., 154 Cal. App. 4th 1 (2d Dist, 2007)

411 words - 2 pages reimbursable expenses. The final award of the court effected over 27,000 FedEx drivers who were mislabeled as independent contractors. SIGNIFICANCE Under this case the significance of the Courts decision to apply and expand the initial lawsuit of several FedEx employees to a class action claim was very important. The case applied to many drivers who operated in the role of employee but held the label of independent contractor. The court used an

Acc543 Mid Term/Final Study Guide

2448 words - 10 pages “independent contractor agreement” in which the terms of this arrangement are specified. Which of the following is true? A. Susan Marie would be treated as an employee because she is paid for the work that she does. B. Susan Marie would be treated as an employee because of the control exercised by the software company over her work and because of the manner in which she is paid. C. Susan Marie would be treated as an independent contractor because

Keller V. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc Case Study

462 words - 2 pages CASE STUDY: IMPLIED WARRANTY In this paper, Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc. case will be reviewed to determine if Inland Metals made an express warranty and if they breached it. A warranty is “a guarantee that goods will meet certain standards” (Beatty, 2008, p.231). Warranties can be written or an oral agreement that is given by the seller or manufacturer to the buyer. When the seller’s actions or words convey that

Management

837 words - 4 pages create competitive advantage by means of differentiation, innovation, channel domination, cost reductions and efficiency improvements. Although this study addresses the need for unique strategies for different Internet companies, further research is required to address the problems faced by traditional firms when they compete against e-business companies. The Use of Information Technology on Gaining Competitive Advantage in Turkish Contractor

Juris Doctor

932 words - 4 pages ) & Intra Strata Assurance Corp. (Surety). Due to failure of Aegean to comply w/the project, Sps. Amurao filed a Complaint vs. the Sureties to collect on the performance bond at the RTC QC. Manila Ins. filed a (motion to dismiss) M/D seeks to dismiss on grounds: 1) Lack of cause of action vs. Surety that filing of Complaint is premature due to failure to implead principal contractor; and that at the time the Surety Issued the performance bond, CCA

Whistleblowing

3746 words - 15 pages decades not much has changed in protection of the whistleblower. Legal protection exists for whistleblowers but it depends on whether the employee works in the public or private sector. The dated article shows that not much has changed for the employee who puts the public interest and welfare before that of the employer. In this case much protection is still needed for the whistleblower. Regarding Medland’s (2013) research on how whistleblowing

Marketing

2787 words - 12 pages ). However, from 2006, it has been reported that the employees assembling iPhones, iPads and other devices in contract manufacturers, such as Foxconn and Inventec often work in harsh conditions. Thus, a question has been arisen that whether Apple should be responsible for the actions of Foxconn. According to the case study, this essay will argue that Apple is partially accountable for the actions of Foxconn through analyzing the theory of

How To Write A Case Study

470 words - 2 pages structure and control systems that the company is using to implement its business strategies. Evaluate organizational change, levels of hierarchy, employee rewards, conflicts, and other issues that are important to the company you are analyzing. 8. Make Recommendations. The final part of your case study analysis should include your recommendations for the company. Every recommendation you make should be based on and supported by the context

Studies

2223 words - 9 pages . Administrators and professionals have to be extremely cost conscious. Effective computerised systems and procedures need to be implemented to ensure proper utilization of limited resources toward quality health care. It becomes even more important when an in-house medical facility is provided by an industry for it’s employees, as is the case for Tata Steel. Patient care management in Tata hospital has fully utilised the power of computers in

Mgmnt 303

380 words - 2 pages 1. What does this case imply about the supply of and demand for employees and the implications for businesses? The case study 1 implies the supply of and demand for employees and the implications for businesses are critical. Based off the case study in Management 12th edition, “Attracting and selecting the right talent is critical to a company’s success. For tech companies, the process is even more critical since it’s the knowledge, skills

Similar Documents

Case Study Employee Benefits For Medical Center

2177 words - 9 pages GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER: AFFECTS OF THE MERGER ON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Executive Summary I. Introduction The purpose of this case study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the changes in employee benefits as a result of the merger. II. Situation As of 17 January 1997 our HMO, the Geisinger Health System (GHS) merged with the former Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (HMC). Since

Ob In Action Case Study: Companies Are Trying To Improve Employee Attitudes During The Recession

2685 words - 11 pages OB in Action Case Study: Companies Are Trying to Improve Employee Attitudes during the Recession Introduction “Creating an effective and productive workplace takes a firm commitment from management even in the best of times” (Ballard, 2012). When the recession hit full force, many companies had to make some difficult decisions. “In a 2009 survey conducted by the American Psychological Association, 68 percent of employed Americans reported

Best Buy Sales Promotion Essay

492 words - 2 pages several reasons that show that she is a dependent contractor First,Maria owned a specific work schedule that the company give and she can use the company’s equipment and supplies.And Maria had a business card with the name of the company, including her business contacts. What is more, she only can works for her company does not work for competitor. In addition, she was in the charge of her employee in her office and was required to complete

Ops571 Essay

1025 words - 5 pages harassment at an earlier date the employee, on the other hand, may be charged for improper conduct, in this case, the defendant is liable for contract termination or demotion if found guilty. The defendant is not allowed by law to make unwelcomed sexual advancement on another employee to a point where the plaintiff is unable to work properly. If this case would have involved an independent contractor versus an employee then, in this case, the